The rejection of history takes a more aggressive form inwhere it becomes impossible to understand the past, because the details of the past are constantly rewritten to conform with the requirements of the present.
In fact, advances in reproductive science and cloning technologies have made it appear all the more prescient. However, the proles —not as heavily controlled and conditioned as Party members—have not lost their humanity.
The style and presentation of these novels varies quite considerably. He is logically correct in realising that they could do so, but at the same time it is clear that the proles are extremely unlikely to take such action.
The Party revises everything to comply with the requirements of the future. Winston Smith himself takes part in this, rewriting the news: Every aspect of his life is regulated, and he can hardly call his thoughts his own, since the concept of Thoughtcrime makes it plain to him that his rebellious thoughts are forbidden, and the existence of the Thought Police makes him certain that he will be caught and horribly punished.
Anything from the past in this civilization holds no importance. In the tenth dictionary of Newspeak, we are told, certain words have been made obsolete—the opposite of what naturally happens to a language, for words become obsolete because they have ceased 1984 brave new world compare contrast essay be used, rather than because they have been erased.
In Brave New World, of course, the conditioning is done openly and for the acknowledged purpose of fitting different people to their different roles in life.
Both novels also present the importance of language to human thought. The 1984 brave new world compare contrast essay is kept content with a rather meagre lot because of the constant war, which, as is explicitly stated in the Book, is a convenient means of maintaining the status quo, and the Party keeps a very close watch on those members of society who are deemed capable of disrupting it.
Just as history is effectively abolished in both societies, so is the family. Newspeak seeks to condense the human language to the functional minimum. Other than telescreens and the ever-present surveillance equipment, all real science has been abolished because the Party does not want anyone to be given a reason to oppose them.
Huxley seems to have passed over the ideas of automation so that even the lowest in the caste system have a purpose, including toiling away in factories or working in elevators. Orwell posits a certain level of technological advance—the two-way television screens and the ever-present surveillance equipment, the novel-writing machines, but not much else.
Newspeak seeks to reduce language to the functional minimum, to eliminate nuance and eradicate style. Children are brought up in government facilities where they are conditioned to act and behave to benefit society.
However, the idea of automation seems to have passed him by, so that people are grown for the purposes of toiling in factories or operating elevators.
Winston recognises this, contrasting his own callousness with their willingness to care even when the caring will make no actual difference. In Orewell does not emphasize technological advances since the only technology uses are by the Party and are used to maintain control of Oceania.
In Brave New World, intercourse is completely separate from reproduction. People in this society are no longer born but decanted in Hatchery and Conditioning Centers. Yet Winston does retain a normal human dread of actual death: To keep this society in balance there has to be a need for production, and so the people are taught to replace an item that still is functional, but has a minor imperfection with a new one.
One day they are there and the next they are gone. More essays like this: Disillusioned and alarmed by what they saw in society, each author produced a powerful satire and an alarming vision of future possibilities. They both address essentially the same issues—language, control, production, and sex, they just treat them in different ways.
Huxley extrapolates the trend for elective childbearing until it becomes grotesque: The difficulties of twentieth-century life have been smoothed over in order to keep the members of society happy—and by and large, they do seem to be happy, at least in a trivial sense.
Winston considers sex to be a political act, an expression of freedom. Human beings and the goods they make are tailored to one another: The females in this society that are fertile are repeatedly conditioned to use contraceptives. In Brave New World Huxley creates a society which is carefully balanced, and the two factors that maintain the balance are reproduction and production.
There is no benign intent behind The Party, only the desire for Power, absolute and unceasing. His purpose was not to imagine the details of such technologies, but to present the use to which they are put. Thus the family becomes one more means of surveillance, so that everyone is surrounded by people who cannot be trusted.
It believes that science in the hands of the public presents a threat. In Brave New World, individuals barely exist in the first place: In Brave New World, sexual intercourse is completely separate from reproduction.Science Fiction Essay Two classic novels, written by George Orwell and Brave New World penned by Aldous Huxley both possess similar topics and themes.
In both novels societies are striving for a utopia, or a perfect society. Module Five If Brave New World was Aldous Huxley's technocratic purgatory, Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-four describes a hell beyond Huxley's worst fears.
Compare and contrast the two novels as visions of a future that has gone dramatically wrong. In contrast toBrave New World doesn’t need fear since if they want change, they create new beings to change or just bring out soma but still, control is maintained. The Road- Brave New World Compare and Contrast Essay.
differentiated works of literature can be so similar and yet so different, just by the way the authors choose to use select certain literary devices.
Compare and Contrast Themes of Brave New World and Essay Science Fiction Essay Two classic novels, written by George Orwell and Brave New World penned by Aldous Huxley both possess similar topics and themes. Comparing and Brave New World Essay - Comparing Orwell's and Huxley's Brave New World In Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four and Huxley’s Brave New World, the authoritative figures strive for freedom, peace, and stability for all, to .Download